Skip to content
Jaylen Henderson
Jaylen Henderson

#13Jaylen Henderson

Jaylen Henderson is a Clutch Passer for West Virginia. Jaylen's 2025 season produced -4.7 total EPA across 33 plays.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jaylen Henderson's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Passing
7/18 Comp/Att50 Pass yards0 Pass TD0 INT38.9% Comp %
Rushing
146 Rush yards1 Rush TD29 Carries5.0 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume39
  • Dual-Threat47
  • Consistency0
  • Clutch100
Player type
Clutch Passer

Elevates on passing downs — 3rd-and-medium, two-minute drills, and pressure situations are where this QB is best.

3rd-down precisionLate-game valueHigh passing-down EPA
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.69 EPA/play in Wk 4 vs Kansas (SP+ 4).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.6900.69Wk 1 vs Robert Morris: -0.16 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Ohio: -0.55 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Pittsburgh: -0.18 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Kansas: +0.69 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Utah: -0.16 EPA/play5
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsRobert MorrisW45-30/200083.1400-0.16
2@OhioL10-17-4.00/20005.040-0.55
3vsPittsburghW31-248.42/3120016.3-50-0.18
4@KansasL10-414.12/4160098.77910.69
5vsUtahL14-4822.23/7220023.0280-0.16

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
13.7%
Passing plays
15.8%
Rushing plays
12.3%
Standard downs
12.7%
Passing downs
16.2%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.40
Passing downs
0.26
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.47 / 0.14

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.