Skip to content
Javin Gordon

#6Javin Gordon

Javin Gordon is a Committee Back for Tulane. Javin's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 136 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Javin Gordon's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
516 Rush yards5 Rush TD128 Carries4.0 Yards/carry
Receiving
13 Receptions93 Rec yards1 Rec TD7.2 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume43
  • Explosiveness20
  • Consistency0
  • Receiving51
Player type
Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.11 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.35 EPA/play in Wk 5 vs Tulsa (SP+ -10).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.4200.42Wk 1 vs Northwestern: -0.14 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs South Alabama: +0.13 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Duke: -0.25 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Ole Miss: -0.05 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Tulsa: +0.35 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs East Carolina: +0.10 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Army: -0.13 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs UTSA: -0.07 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Memphis: +0.18 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Florida Atlantic: -0.32 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Temple: -0.26 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Charlotte: +0.24 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs North Texas: -0.42 EPA/play15
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsNorthwesternW23-35.85244.80-0.14
2@South AlabamaW33-31-12.715805.300.13
3vsDukeW34-276.67182.601150-0.25
4@Ole MissL10-4524.08354.40160-0.05
5@TulsaW31-14-10.015785.230.35
7vsEast CarolinaW26-198.010343.4053510.10
8vsArmyW24-170.812403.30130-0.13
10@UTSAL26-483.75193.80-0.07
11@MemphisW38-327.612665.510.18
12vsFlorida AtlanticW35-24-8.75142.80-0.32
13@TempleW37-13-5.18273.40-0.26
14vsCharlotteW27-0-26.79444.9142900.24
15vsNorth TexasW34-2113.811262.40150-0.42
20@Ole MissL10-4124.06111.80

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
15.0%
Passing plays
4.2%
Rushing plays
24.8%
Standard downs
16.1%
Passing downs
12.3%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.03
Passing downs
-0.01
Pass / Rush EPA
0.04 / -0.04

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.