Skip to content
Javian Hester

Javian Hester

Javian Hester is a Red Zone Weapon WR for Kentucky.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Javian Hester's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
8 Receptions117 Rec yards4 Rec TD14.6 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume9
  • Explosiveness51
  • Consistency81
  • Pass-Down72
Player type
Red Zone Weapon WR

Goes from good to great inside the 20 — high TD conversion on limited looks makes this receiver a scoring machine.

Red zone targetHigh TD rateSize/catch radius advantage
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency81th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 2.79 EPA/play in Wk 11 vs Florida (SP+ 4).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+2.7902.79Wk 9 vs Tennessee: +1.08 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Florida: +2.79 EPA/play11Wk 13 vs Vanderbilt: +0.32 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Louisville: +1.59 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
9vsTennesseeL34-5615.04235.82131.08
11vsFloridaW38-73.512929.01292.79
13@VanderbiltL17-4520.325929.51410.32
14@LouisvilleL0-4112.4166.0061.59

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
3.0%
Passing plays
6.0%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
2.6%
Passing downs
4.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
1.18
Passing downs
1.31
Pass / Rush EPA
1.22 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.