Skip to content
Jamari Person

#3Jamari Person

Jamari Person is a Slot Specialist WR for Colorado State. Jamari's 2024 season produced 30.4 total EPA across 34 plays.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jamari Person's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2024 Production

Receiving
35 Receptions373 Rec yards1 Rec TD10.7 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume14
  • Explosiveness24
  • Consistency78
  • Pass-Down10
Player type
Slot Specialist WR

The offense's primary passing-down weapon — routes, separation, and reliability on 3rd down define this role.

3rd-down converterRoute technicianHigh passing-down share
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency78th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 8 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.38 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.56 EPA/play in Wk 6 vs Oregon State (SP+ -7).

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Quadree HendersonPittsburgh0.5301.633.4
DeAndre HughesAir Force0.4701.328.2
Keytaon ThompsonMississippi State0.4601.232.2
Bert Emanuel Jr.Central Michigan0.4601.624.4
Savion WilliamsTCU0.4501.125.2

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.5601.56Wk 2 vs Northern Colorado: +0.22 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Colorado: +0.44 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs UTEP: +1.20 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Oregon State: +1.56 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs San José State: +1.54 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Air Force: +1.26 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs New Mexico: -0.11 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Nevada: +1.41 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Wyoming: -0.14 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Fresno State: +1.08 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Utah State: +0.84 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
2vsNorthern ColoradoW38-173206.70110.22
3vsColoradoL9-288.17517.30190.44
4vsUTEPW27-17-22.73258.30131.20
6@Oregon StateL31-39-6.722311.50191.56
7vsSan José StateW31-24-5.524120.50321.54
8@Air ForceW21-13-11.722814.00241.26
9vsNew MexicoW17-6-14.8144.004-0.11
10@NevadaW38-21-15.211212.00121.41
12vsWyomingW24-10-13.6133.003-0.14
13@Fresno StateL22-28-3.8911212.41601.08
14vsUtah StateW42-37-10.445413.50200.84

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
4.9%
Passing plays
11.1%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
3.7%
Passing downs
7.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
1.01
Passing downs
0.78
Pass / Rush EPA
0.89 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.