Skip to content
Jalen Buckley

#6Jalen Buckley

RB·Western Michigan·20233.2 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Jalen Buckley is a Featured Back for Western Michigan. Jalen's 2023 season ranks in the 70th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 201 plays — a average rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jalen Buckley's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Rushing
997 Rush yards10 Rush TD189 Carries5.3 Yards/carry
Receiving
18 Receptions161 Rec yards0 Rec TD8.9 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency70
  • Volume78
  • Explosiveness46
  • Consistency69
  • Receiving49
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)70th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency69th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.42 EPA/play in Wk 8 vs Ohio (SP+ -2).

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Travis EtienneClemson0.4704.7100.1
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.4105.298.4
James FlandersTulsa0.3904.9103.7
Nick WilsonArizona0.4105.2102.5

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.4200.42Wk 1 vs St. Francis (PA): +0.34 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Syracuse: +0.41 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Iowa: -0.18 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Toledo: +0.32 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Ball State: +0.11 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Miami (OH): +0.16 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Ohio: +0.42 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Eastern Michigan: +0.31 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Central Michigan: +0.23 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Northern Illinois: -0.20 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Bowling Green: +0.31 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsSt. Francis (PA)W35-17301946.511400.34
2@SyracuseL7-48-4.488710.910.41
3@IowaL10-415.814302.10-0.18
4@ToledoL31-493.7291906.620.32
5vsBall StateW42-24-14.913503.8131100.11
7vsMiami (OH)L21-342.814614.4044700.16
8@OhioL17-20-1.66193.2045900.42
9@Eastern MichiganW45-21-12.3251385.521800.31
11vsCentral MichiganW38-28-19.1231175.1221000.23
12@Northern IllinoisL0-24-7.59262.90170-0.20
13vsBowling GreenL10-34-7.818854.7121500.31

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
27.2%
Passing plays
7.4%
Rushing plays
44.8%
Standard downs
31.6%
Passing downs
17.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.20
Passing downs
0.39
Pass / Rush EPA
0.21 / 0.24

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.480−0.26
EPA per play · 2023 · 11 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.