#4Jacquon Gibson

WR·Massachusetts·2025

Jacquon Gibson is a Possession Receiver WR for Massachusetts. Jacquon's 2025 season ranks in the 67th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 98 plays — a average rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

Usage share (volume)0.47
Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
Total EPA (value)0.45
Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jacquon Gibson's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving

63 Receptions616 Rec yards0 Rec TD9.8 Yards/rec

Returns

3 Kick returns71 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

Efficiency67
Volume58
Explosiveness19
Consistency72
Pass-Down96

Player type

Possession Receiver WR

Chain-mover who earns targets through reliability. High volume, short-to-intermediate routes, consistent floor every week.

High target shareChain moverReliable floor

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)67th %ile · average

Game-to-game consistency72th %ile · average

Key findings

▸High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
▸Peak game: 0.49 EPA/play in Wk 6 vs Western Michigan (SP+ -1).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗

Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

Player	Team	Yr	Plays	WEPA/play	Line val	Total EPA
Davis Bryson	Kennesaw State	2024	97	0.200	0.0	19.4
Hyleck Foster	Marshall	2015	101	0.180	0.5	18.2
Amare Jones	Tulane	2020	71	0.180	0.0	12.8
De'Michael Harris	Southern Miss	2019	117	0.130	0.7	15.2
Eli Heidenreich	Navy	2025	70	0.220	0.8	15.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	Rec	Rec Yds	Avg	Long	EPA/play
1	vsTemple	L10-42	-5.1	12	132	11.0	39	0.24
2	vsBryant	L26-27	—	7	89	12.7	50	0.26
3	@Iowa	L7-47	19.7	5	37	7.4	13	0.08
5	@Missouri	L6-42	14.4	6	30	5.0	24	-0.10
6	vsWestern Michigan	L3-21	-1.4	6	70	11.7	22	0.49
11	@Akron	L10-44	-13.9	6	35	5.8	13	-0.01
12	vsNorthern Illinois	L3-45	-16.7	6	64	10.7	19	0.28
13	@Ohio	L14-42	-4.0	5	21	4.2	8	0.12
14	vsBowling Green	L14-45	-12.6	10	138	13.8	48	0.32

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy

Overall

20.3%

Passing plays

32.1%

Rushing plays

5.0%

Standard downs

17.6%

Passing downs

25.1%

EPA by down type

Standard downs: 0.07
Passing downs: 0.34
Pass / Rush EPA: 0.19 / 0.15

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).