#11Jackson Brousseau

QB·Colorado State·2025

Jackson Brousseau is a Dual-Threat QB for Colorado State. Jackson's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 246 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

Usage share (volume)0.46
Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
Total EPA (value)0.51
Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jackson Brousseau's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Passing

128/201 Comp/Att1354 Pass yards9 Pass TD3 INT63.7% Comp %

Rushing

15 Rush yards1 Rush TD54 Carries0.3 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

Efficiency0
Volume100
Dual-Threat96
Consistency33
Clutch68

Player type

Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg

Game-to-game consistency33th %ile · below avg

Key findings

▸Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
▸High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
▸High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
▸Production faded as the season progressed — 0.43 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
▸Peak game: 0.59 EPA/play in Wk 4 vs UTSA (SP+ 4).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗

Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	C/ATT	Pass Yds	Pass TD	INT	QBR	Rush Yds	Rush TD	EPA/play
4	vsUTSA	L16-17	3.7	10/12	78	1	0	90.0	6	0	0.59
5	vsWashington State	L3-20	3.8	19/28	188	0	0	37.8	21	0	0.24
6	@San Diego State	L24-45	6.7	13/25	155	1	0	32.9	-7	1	0.12
7	vsFresno State	W49-21	1.8	12/18	144	3	0	81.1	5	0	0.42
8	vsHawai'i	L19-31	1.7	15/29	176	1	0	32.8	-16	0	0.19
9	@Wyoming	L0-28	-11.3	10/18	99	0	3	3.8	13	0	-0.37
11	vsUNLV	L10-42	4.3	13/22	153	1	0	49.2	4	0	-0.04
12	@New Mexico	L17-20	0.9	8/12	38	0	0	22.2	-8	0	-0.28
14	vsAir Force	L21-42	-3.2	28/37	323	2	0	56.0	-3	0	0.35

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy

Overall

44.4%

Passing plays

69.5%

Rushing plays

13.7%

Standard downs

41.4%

Passing downs

50.0%

EPA by down type

Standard downs: 0.10
Passing downs: 0.24
Pass / Rush EPA: 0.14 / 0.38

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).