Skip to content
Isiah St. Romain
Isiah St. Romain

#17Isiah St. Romain

Isiah St. Romain is a Red Zone Weapon WR for North Dakota State.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Isiah St. Romain's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
4 Receptions50 Rec yards1 Rec TD12.5 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency33
  • Volume6
  • Explosiveness37
  • Consistency80
  • Pass-Down50
Player type
Red Zone Weapon WR

Goes from good to great inside the 20 — high TD conversion on limited looks makes this receiver a scoring machine.

Red zone targetHigh TD rateSize/catch radius advantage
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)
Game-to-game consistency80th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Peak game: 3.13 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs The Citadel.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
De'Michael HarrisSouthern Miss0.1300.715.2
Hyleck FosterMarshall0.1800.518.2
Amare JonesTulane0.1800.012.8
Shai WertsGeorgia Southern0.1500.024.2
Davis BrysonKennesaw State0.2000.019.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+3.1303.13Wk 1 vs The Citadel: +3.13 EPA/play1Wk 7 vs Southern Illinois: +1.25 EPA/play7Wk 13 vs St. Thomas (MN): +0.51 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1@The CitadelW38-011515.01153.13
7vsSouthern IllinoisW45-1722311.50131.25
13vsSt. Thomas (MN)W62-711212.00120.51

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
2.1%
Passing plays
6.2%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
1.4%
Passing downs
3.7%

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.