Skip to content
Hank Brown

#9Hank Brown

QB·Iowa·2026

Hank Brown is a Dual-Threat QB for Iowa.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

26%
projected
band 8%'25 12%44%

Regressed toward the QB mean. Model correlation r≈0.46 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Hank Brown's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2026 Production

Passing
12/20 Comp/Att129 Pass yards1 Pass TD0 INT60.0% Comp %
Rushing
12 Rush yards0 Rush TD2 Carries6.0 Yards/carry

Air yards

Where the ball goes, and how much of the gain is the throw rather than the run after it.

20
Attempts
9.5y
Avg depth
5.0y
After catch
60%
Catch rate

The ball travels 9.5 yards in the air on an average throw 1.7 yards deeper than the median. Another 5.0 comes after the catch.

Where he throws

attempts · completion rate · yards
deep
1
0% · 0y
0
1
0% · 0y
short
7
57% · 54y
5
80% · 53y
6
67% · 22y
leftmiddleright

Depth and direction come from CFBD’s passing detail, which is backfilled after the games: this covers weeks 1–2 only. Spikes, throwaways and intentional grounding are excluded before any average.

Performance Analysis · 2026 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency75
  • Volume79
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency50
  • Clutch100
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)75th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Above-average efficiency for the QB position (75th percentile).
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.

NIL Market Tier· 2026

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsNorthern IllinoisW40-0-22.312/20129101200.44

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
27.8%
Passing plays
51.3%
Rushing plays
5.3%
Standard downs
28.3%
Passing downs
26.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.18
Passing downs
0.97
Pass / Rush EPA
0.31 / 1.69

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.