Skip to content
Gideon Ituka

#10Gideon Ituka

Gideon Ituka is a Committee Back for Wisconsin. Gideon's 2025 season produced -2.6 total EPA across 49 plays.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Gideon Ituka's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
255 Rush yards0 Rush TD60 Carries4.3 Yards/carry
Receiving
1 Receptions0 Rec yards0 Rec TD0.0 Yards/rec
Returns
1 Kick returns8 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume52
  • Explosiveness26
  • Consistency0
  • Receiving24
Player type
Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.21 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.52 EPA/play in Wk 8 vs Ohio State (SP+ 30).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.5200.52Wk 2 vs Middle Tennessee: -0.42 EPA/play2Wk 7 vs Iowa: +0.34 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Ohio State: +0.52 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Oregon: +0.14 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Washington: -0.15 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Indiana: -0.19 EPA/play12
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
2vsMiddle TennesseeW42-10-16.0263.00-0.42
7vsIowaL0-3719.75244.800.34
8vsOhio StateL0-3430.14358.800.52
9@OregonL7-2125.921854.000.14
11vsWashingtonW13-1018.419733.80-0.15
12@IndianaL7-3132.49323.60100-0.19

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
18.3%
Passing plays
2.4%
Rushing plays
29.1%
Standard downs
21.1%
Passing downs
13.2%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.23
Passing downs
0.42
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.98 / 0.01

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.