Skip to content
Fame Ijeboi

#2Fame Ijeboi

Fame Ijeboi is a Committee Back for Minnesota. Fame's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 87 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Fame Ijeboi's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
441 Rush yards2 Rush TD97 Carries4.5 Yards/carry
Receiving
12 Receptions54 Rec yards1 Rec TD4.5 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume49
  • Explosiveness30
  • Consistency0
  • Receiving48
Player type
Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.09 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.73 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Northwestern State.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.7300.73Wk 2 vs Northwestern State: +0.73 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs California: -0.10 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs Rutgers: +0.04 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Ohio State: -0.06 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Purdue: +0.01 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Nebraska: -0.06 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Iowa: -0.40 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Michigan State: -0.07 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Oregon: -0.04 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Northwestern: +0.47 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Wisconsin: +0.18 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
2vsNorthwestern StateW66-07517.3022210.73
3@CaliforniaL14-27-3.216855.301-10-0.10
5vsRutgersW31-281.012373.1111200.04
6@Ohio StateL3-4230.113524.00-0.06
7vsPurdueW27-20-6.111200.01
8vsNebraskaW24-66.28344.30-0.06
9@IowaL3-4119.79171.90300-0.40
10vsMichigan StateW23-20-3.4171086.412-10-0.07
12@OregonL13-4225.9393.002100-0.04
13vsNorthwesternL35-385.85234.600.47
14vsWisconsinW17-7-4.47253.600.18

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
17.0%
Passing plays
4.5%
Rushing plays
33.5%
Standard downs
19.0%
Passing downs
12.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.04
Passing downs
0.02
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.39 / 0.02

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.