Skip to content
Elijah Metcalf

#9Elijah Metcalf

Elijah Metcalf is a Versatile WR for Southern Miss. Elijah's 2025 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 79 plays — a elite rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Elijah Metcalf's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
54 Receptions683 Rec yards2 Rec TD12.6 Yards/rec
Returns
10 Punt returns93 PR yards0 PR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume27
  • Explosiveness38
  • Consistency67
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency67th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • 7 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.43 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 1.70 EPA/play in Wk 11 vs Arkansas State (SP+ -9).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Keytaon ThompsonMississippi State0.4601.232.2
Savion WilliamsTCU0.4501.125.2
Zach AbeyNavy0.3700.825.9
Dane KinamonAir Force0.4100.716.0
DeAndre HughesAir Force0.4701.328.2

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.7001.70Wk 1 vs Mississippi State: -0.30 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Jackson State: +0.84 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs App State: +0.91 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Louisiana Tech: -0.02 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Jacksonville State: +0.07 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Georgia Southern: +0.41 EPA/play7Wk 9 vs UL Monroe: +0.77 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Arkansas State: +1.70 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Texas State: +0.92 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs South Alabama: +0.53 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Troy: -0.15 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsMississippi StateL17-344.12136.5012-0.30
2vsJackson StateW38-205459.00110.84
3vsApp StateW38-22-11.436622.00480.91
4@Louisiana TechL20-30-1.322914.5024-0.02
5vsJacksonville StateW42-25-6.72-9-4.5000.07
7@Georgia SouthernW38-35-9.446215.50300.41
8@LouisianaW22-10-10.1
9vsUL MonroeW49-21-21.677610.90300.77
11@Arkansas StateW27-21-8.8514328.61761.70
12vsTexas StateL14-412.31011611.61340.92
13@South AlabamaL35-42-12.767412.30320.53
14vsTroyL18-28-4.866210.3026-0.15
20vsWestern KentuckyL16-271.6263.007

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
9.6%
Passing plays
17.6%
Rushing plays
1.0%
Standard downs
9.7%
Passing downs
9.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.28
Passing downs
0.76
Pass / Rush EPA
0.47 / 0.04

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.