Skip to content
Elijah Canion

#5Elijah Canion

Elijah Canion is a Slot Specialist WR for Liberty.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Elijah Canion's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
4 Receptions57 Rec yards0 Rec TD14.3 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency50
  • Volume7
  • Explosiveness48
  • Consistency86
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Slot Specialist WR

The offense's primary passing-down weapon — routes, separation, and reliability on 3rd down define this role.

3rd-down converterRoute technicianHigh passing-down share
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)50th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency86th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 1.25 EPA/play in Wk 10 vs Delaware (SP+ -11).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Amare JonesTulane0.1800.012.8
Brandon ChatmanNavy0.2300.612.0
Tyler BuchnerNotre Dame0.2500.312.8
Amare JonesTulane0.2300.813.3
Justin LynchTemple0.2400.315.1

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.2501.25Wk 1 vs Maine: +0.67 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Jacksonville State: +0.37 EPA/play2Wk 10 vs Delaware: +1.25 EPA/play10
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsMaineW28-722110.50150.67
2@Jacksonville StateL24-34-6.712222.00220.37
10vsDelawareW59-30-10.911414.00141.25

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
2.6%
Passing plays
6.2%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
2.0%
Passing downs
4.2%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.61
Passing downs
1.02
Pass / Rush EPA
0.12 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.