Skip to content
DJ Irons

DJ Irons

QB·Akron·2023

DJ Irons is a Clutch Passer for Akron. DJ's 2023 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 126 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So DJ Irons's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Passing
88/133 Comp/Att722 Pass yards3 Pass TD3 INT66.2% Comp %
Rushing
215 Rush yards2 Rush TD61 Carries3.5 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat44
  • Consistency0
  • Clutch100
Player type
Clutch Passer

Elevates on passing downs — 3rd-and-medium, two-minute drills, and pressure situations are where this QB is best.

3rd-down precisionLate-game valueHigh passing-down EPA
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.2600.26Wk 1 vs Temple: +0.14 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Morgan State: -0.23 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Kentucky: -0.09 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Indiana: +0.26 EPA/play4
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1@TempleL21-24-21.017/292052120.9-700.14
2vsMorgan StateW24-217/957002.8-260-0.23
3@KentuckyL3-3510.523/341300041.7300-0.09
4@IndianaL27-29-7.422/351940269.614120.26
5vsBuffaloL10-13-15.219/261361026.3770

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
59.9%
Passing plays
77.2%
Rushing plays
34.5%
Standard downs
53.9%
Passing downs
74.3%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.03
Passing downs
0.31
Pass / Rush EPA
0.08 / 0.12

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.