#22Diore Hubbard

RB·West Virginia·2025

Diore Hubbard is a Committee Back for West Virginia. Diore's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 98 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

Usage share (volume)0.52
Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
Total EPA (value)0.41
Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Diore Hubbard's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing

335 Rush yards4 Rush TD96 Carries3.5 Yards/carry

Receiving

16 Receptions156 Rec yards0 Rec TD9.8 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

Efficiency0
Volume55
Explosiveness10
Consistency0
Receiving67

Player type

Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg

Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg

Key findings

▸Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
▸High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
▸Production faded as the season progressed — 0.16 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
▸Peak game: 0.51 EPA/play in Wk 5 vs Utah (SP+ 22).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗

Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	Car	Rush Yds	Avg	Rush TD	Rec	Rec Yds	Rec TD	EPA/play
4	@Kansas	L10-41	4.1	3	16	5.3	0	—	—	—	0.21
5	vsUtah	L14-48	22.2	10	61	6.1	1	—	—	—	0.51
6	@BYU	L24-38	15.9	17	32	1.9	1	1	7	0	-0.45
8	@UCF	L13-45	-1.2	5	15	3.0	1	3	15	0	0.21
9	vsTCU	L17-23	8.3	14	32	2.3	0	3	32	0	-0.25
10	@Houston	W45-35	7.4	29	108	3.7	1	2	5	0	-0.01
11	vsColorado	W29-22	-8.3	16	64	4.0	0	6	94	0	0.27
12	@Arizona State	L23-25	3.9	2	7	3.5	0	1	3	0	-0.17

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy

Overall

19.2%

Passing plays

7.1%

Rushing plays

27.5%

Standard downs

22.5%

Passing downs

11.1%

EPA by down type

Standard downs: -0.17
Passing downs: 0.35
Pass / Rush EPA: 0.47 / -0.17

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).