Skip to content
Deuce Alexander

#1Deuce Alexander

Deuce Alexander is a Versatile WR for Ole Miss. Deuce's 2025 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 75 plays — a elite rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Deuce Alexander's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
122 Rush yards0 Rush TD19 Carries6.4 Yards/carry
Receiving
44 Receptions684 Rec yards2 Rec TD15.5 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume21
  • Explosiveness57
  • Consistency60
  • Pass-Down36
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency60th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • 6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.56 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.61 EPA/play in Wk 10 vs South Carolina (SP+ 6).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Eli HeidenreichNavy0.3400.722.4
Zach AbeyNavy0.3700.825.9
Chris TyreeNotre Dame0.3100.623.6
Noah ShortArmy0.3000.520.7
Ainias SmithTexas A&M0.3100.517.0

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.6101.61Wk 1 vs Georgia State: +0.67 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Kentucky: +0.64 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Arkansas: +1.33 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Tulane: +1.32 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs LSU: +0.53 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Washington State: +0.34 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Georgia: +0.37 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Oklahoma: -0.08 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs South Carolina: +1.61 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs The Citadel: -0.36 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Florida: +0.12 EPA/play12Wk 14 vs Mississippi State: -0.64 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsGeorgia StateW63-7-24.52178.5090.67
2@KentuckyW30-231.846817.00300.64
3vsArkansasW41-355.147017.50351.33
4vsTulaneW45-106.349423.51351.32
5vsLSUW24-1910.336421.30250.53
7vsWashington StateW24-213.833612.00180.34
8@GeorgiaL35-4324.123316.50320.37
9@OklahomaW34-2618.33124.006-0.08
10vsSouth CarolinaW30-145.925226.00431.61
11vsThe CitadelW49-03217.0011-0.36
12vsFloridaW34-243.52168.0090.12
14@Mississippi StateW38-194.129447.0188-0.64
20vsGeorgiaW39-3424.12136.507
20vsMiamiL27-3120.7177.007
20vsTulaneW41-106.378712.4026

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
7.2%
Passing plays
11.4%
Rushing plays
3.4%
Standard downs
6.5%
Passing downs
9.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.39
Passing downs
0.31
Pass / Rush EPA
0.40 / 0.23

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.