Skip to content
Bryson Graves

#0Bryson Graves

Bryson Graves is a Slot Specialist WR for Coastal Carolina. Bryson's 2025 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 55 plays — a elite rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Bryson Graves's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
35 Receptions330 Rec yards2 Rec TD9.4 Yards/rec
Returns
18 Punt returns115 PR yards0 PR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume21
  • Explosiveness16
  • Consistency0
  • Pass-Down70
Player type
Slot Specialist WR

The offense's primary passing-down weapon — routes, separation, and reliability on 3rd down define this role.

3rd-down converterRoute technicianHigh passing-down share
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.36 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 1.24 EPA/play in Wk 12 vs Georgia Southern (SP+ -9).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Tyler BuchnerNotre Dame0.2500.312.8
Samajie GrantArizona0.2500.315.5
Justin LynchTemple0.2400.315.1
Brandon ChatmanNavy0.2300.612.0
Xavier WhiteTexas Tech0.3000.518.6

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.2401.24Wk 1 vs Virginia: -0.42 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Charleston Southern: +0.76 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs East Carolina: -0.13 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs South Alabama: +0.27 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Old Dominion: -0.67 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs UL Monroe: -0.19 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs App State: +0.13 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Marshall: +0.94 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Georgia Southern: +1.24 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs South Carolina: -0.92 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs James Madison: -0.05 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1@VirginiaL7-4811.111010.0010-0.42
2vsCharleston SouthernW13-056112.20210.76
3vsEast CarolinaL0-388.03248.0011-0.13
4@South AlabamaW38-20-12.75357.00240.27
6@Old DominionL7-475.9122.002-0.67
7vsUL MonroeW23-8-21.6155.005-0.19
8@App StateW45-37-11.43217.0080.13
10vsMarshallW44-27-4.523919.51220.94
11vsGeorgia StateW40-27-24.5
12@Georgia SouthernL40-45-9.4122.0021.24
13@South CarolinaL7-515.94112.807-0.92
14vsJames MadisonL10-5912.33217.0112-0.05
20vsLouisiana TechL14-23-1.369916.5039

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
7.4%
Passing plays
14.6%
Rushing plays
0.7%
Standard downs
5.6%
Passing downs
10.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.20
Passing downs
0.31
Pass / Rush EPA
0.32 / -0.90

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.