Skip to content
Bryce Perkins

#3Bryce Perkins

QB·Virginia·201920184.0 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Bryce Perkins is a 2-year Dual-Threat QB for Virginia. Bryce's 2019 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 704 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Bryce Perkins's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2019 Production

Passing
320/496 Comp/Att3538 Pass yards22 Pass TD12 INT64.5% Comp %
Rushing
769 Rush yards11 Rush TD227 Carries3.4 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2019 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat65
  • Consistency80
  • Clutch49
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency80th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.09 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 0.46 EPA/play in Wk 10 vs North Carolina (SP+ 10).

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.4600.46Wk 1 vs Pittsburgh: +0.09 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs William & Mary: +0.44 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Florida State: +0.27 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Old Dominion: +0.01 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Notre Dame: +0.13 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Miami: +0.11 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Duke: +0.11 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Louisville: +0.04 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs North Carolina: +0.46 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Georgia Tech: +0.24 EPA/play11Wk 13 vs Liberty: +0.23 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Virginia Tech: +0.36 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs Clemson: +0.19 EPA/play15Wk 1 vs Florida: +0.23 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1@PittsburghW30-144.120/341812050.04400.09
2vsWilliam & MaryW52-1716/261922295.96810.44
3vsFlorida StateW31-241.830/402951270.94600.27
4vsOld DominionW28-17-24.415/241751055.93510.01
5@Notre DameL20-3517.730/433342232.7-2900.13
7@MiamiL9-179.625/422520059.62700.11
8vsDukeW48-14-1.813/261410146.46230.11
9@LouisvilleL21-280.224/412331139.82200.04
10@North CarolinaW38-3110.330/393783011220.46
11vsGeorgia TechW33-28-12.024/352581010610.24
13vsLibertyW55-27-2.618/30199203010.23
14vsVirginia TechW39-308.020/333111116420.36
15vsClemsonL17-6228.127/43266225800.19
1vsFloridaL28-3624.028/40323412400.23

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
73.7%
Passing plays
95.9%
Rushing plays
46.9%
Standard downs
70.7%
Passing downs
80.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.19
Passing downs
0.24
Pass / Rush EPA
0.20 / 0.23

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.690−0.302019
EPA per play · 2018 — 2019 · 27 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2018Virginia
4.9
210.8
2019Virginia
4.0
253.6

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.