Skip to content
Brock Glenn

#11Brock Glenn

Brock Glenn is a Dual-Threat QB for Western Kentucky.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Brock Glenn's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2026 Production

Passing
12/23 Comp/Att84 Pass yards1 Pass TD1 INT52.2% Comp %
Rushing
70 Rush yards2 Rush TD14 Carries5.0 Yards/carry

Air yards

Where the ball goes, and how much of the gain is the throw rather than the run after it.

22
Attempts
4.4y
Avg depth
3.7y
After catch
55%
Catch rate

The ball travels 4.4 yards in the air on an average throw 4.1 yards shorter than the median. Another 3.7 comes after the catch.

Where he throws

attempts · completion rate · yards
deep
0
0
0
short
4
25% · 6y
2
50% · 3y
16
63% · 75y
leftmiddleright

Depth and direction come from CFBD’s passing detail, which is backfilled after the games: this covers weeks 1–2 only. Spikes, throwaways and intentional grounding are excluded before any average.

Performance Analysis · 2026 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume65
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency50
  • Clutch40
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among QBs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.

NIL Market Tier· 2026

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.8900.89Wk 1 vs Nevada: -0.89 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Georgia: +0.21 EPA/play2
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1@NevadaL14-49-6.100-0.89
2@GeorgiaL20-7028.712/23841175.27020.21

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
22.8%
Passing plays
28.8%
Rushing plays
17.1%
Standard downs
22.3%
Passing downs
23.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.83
Passing downs
Pass / Rush EPA
— / 0.83

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.