Skip to content
Brock Glenn

#11Brock Glenn

Brock Glenn is a Dual-Threat QB for Florida State.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Brock Glenn's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Passing
6/10 Comp/Att69 Pass yards2 Pass TD0 INT60.0% Comp %
Rushing
43 Rush yards0 Rush TD7 Carries6.1 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency40
  • Volume17
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency53
  • Clutch40
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)40th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency53th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • Peak game: 1.24 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs East Texas A&M.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.2401.24Wk 2 vs East Texas A&M: +1.24 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs Kent State: +0.46 EPA/play4Wk 10 vs Wake Forest: -0.51 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Virginia Tech: +0.38 EPA/play12
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
2vsEast Texas A&MW77-33/3561099.61001.24
4vsKent StateW66-10-19.32/581048.11600.46
10vsWake ForestW42-75.70/10000.180-0.51
12vsVirginia TechW34-14-10.11/150096.4900.38

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
6.1%
Passing plays
11.4%
Rushing plays
3.7%
Standard downs
6.4%
Passing downs
4.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.38
Passing downs
Pass / Rush EPA
0.10 / 0.66

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.