Skip to content
Brandon Rose
Brandon Rose

#14Brandon Rose

QB·Massachusetts·2025

Brandon Rose is a Clutch Passer for Massachusetts. Brandon's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 96 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Brandon Rose's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Passing
52/88 Comp/Att424 Pass yards1 Pass TD3 INT59.1% Comp %
Rushing
4 Rush yards0 Rush TD27 Carries0.1 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume79
  • Dual-Threat0
  • Consistency0
  • Clutch100
Player type
Clutch Passer

Elevates on passing downs — 3rd-and-medium, two-minute drills, and pressure situations are where this QB is best.

3rd-down precisionLate-game valueHigh passing-down EPA
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • ▸Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • ▸High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • ▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • ▸Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.21 from the first to second half of the season.
  • ▸Peak game: 0.47 EPA/play in Wk 13 vs Ohio (SP+ -4).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.470−0.47Wk 1 vs Temple: -0.18 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Bryant: +0.16 EPA/play2Wk 6 vs Western Michigan: -0.12 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Kent State: -0.07 EPA/play7Wk 12 vs Northern Illinois: +0.08 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Ohio: +0.47 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsTempleL10-42-5.123/381930114.3-10-0.18
2vsBryantL26-27—4/6240022.0——0.16
6vsWestern MichiganL3-21-1.49/17720012.3-80-0.12
7@Kent StateL6-42-19.30/10010.120-0.07
12vsNorthern IllinoisL3-45-16.711/201010025.11200.08
13@OhioL14-42-4.05/6341141.6-100.47

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
27.6%
Passing plays
39.8%
Rushing plays
12.0%
Standard downs
23.2%
Passing downs
35.0%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.36
Passing downs
0.33
Pass / Rush EPA
0.14 / -0.58

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.