Skip to content
Brandon Hood

#26Brandon Hood

Brandon Hood is a Committee Back for Massachusetts. Brandon's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 111 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Brandon Hood's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
368 Rush yards2 Rush TD98 Carries3.8 Yards/carry
Receiving
11 Receptions88 Rec yards0 Rec TD8.0 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume43
  • Explosiveness16
  • Consistency41
  • Receiving48
Player type
Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency41th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.7200.72Wk 1 vs Temple: +0.06 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Bryant: -0.15 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Iowa: -0.72 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs Missouri: -0.12 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Western Michigan: +0.16 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Kent State: +0.02 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Buffalo: +0.15 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Central Michigan: -0.27 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Akron: -0.02 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Northern Illinois: +0.03 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Ohio: -0.25 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Bowling Green: -0.40 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsTempleL10-42-5.1252.501000.06
2vsBryantL26-2711393.511120-0.15
3@IowaL7-4719.73-2-0.70-0.72
5@MissouriL6-4214.4661.00-0.12
6vsWestern MichiganL3-21-1.47223.1022700.16
7@Kent StateL6-42-19.310363.601800.02
8vsBuffaloL21-28-7.5241797.512800.15
9@Central MichiganL13-38-8.86122.00-0.27
11@AkronL10-44-13.910181.80270-0.02
12vsNorthern IllinoisL3-45-16.7451.3022600.03
13@OhioL14-42-4.010393.90-0.25
14vsBowling GreenL14-45-12.6591.80-0.40

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
15.2%
Passing plays
4.0%
Rushing plays
30.7%
Standard downs
19.0%
Passing downs
9.0%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.01
Passing downs
-0.13
Pass / Rush EPA
0.44 / -0.09

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.