Skip to content
Braelon Allen

Braelon Allen

RB·Wisconsin·2023202220212.3 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Braelon Allen is a 3-year Featured Back for Wisconsin. Braelon's 2022 season ranks in the 18th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 217 plays — a developing rate for the RB. Production has trended downward season-over-season on adjusted value metrics.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Braelon Allen's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

Recruiting Profile· Class of 2021

4-Star · High major target
Stars
247 composite
0.9159
National rank
#227
High school
Fond Du Lac
Hometown
Fond Du Lac, WI

Recruiting data from CFBD/247Sports composite. Sourced from the player's signing-class team — transfers show original school's class.

2022 Production

Rushing
1237 Rush yards11 Rush TD229 Carries5.4 Yards/carry
Receiving
13 Receptions104 Rec yards0 Rec TD8.0 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2022 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency18
  • Volume90
  • Explosiveness48
  • Consistency33
  • Receiving32
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)18th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency33th %ile · below avg
Career trajectory:↓ Declining
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • Production has slipped season-over-season on adjusted value metrics.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.09 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.75 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Illinois State.

NIL Market Tier· 2022

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Breece HallIowa State0.3404.5102.3
James FlandersTulsa0.3904.9103.7
Hassan HaskinsMichigan0.3804.8106.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.7500.75Wk 1 vs Illinois State: +0.75 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Washington State: +0.06 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs New Mexico State: +0.40 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Ohio State: +0.25 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Illinois: -0.58 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Northwestern: +0.32 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Michigan State: +0.19 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Purdue: +0.43 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Maryland: +0.33 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Iowa: -0.31 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Nebraska: +0.09 EPA/play12Wk 1 vs Oklahoma State: -0.10 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsIllinois StateW38-01414810.620.75
2vsWashington StateL14-179.521984.7021200.06
3vsNew Mexico StateW66-7-15.415865.730.40
4@Ohio StateL21-5231.1231657.213600.25
5vsIllinoisL10-3415.9820.30-0.58
6@NorthwesternW42-7-13.4231355.9011000.32
7@Michigan StateL28-341.2291234.2233300.19
8vsPurdueW35-247.7161137.1113900.43
10vsMarylandW23-1011.2231195.210.33
11@IowaL10-2412.717402.40140-0.31
12@NebraskaW15-14-1.218925.100.09
1vsOklahoma StateW24-1711.3221165.31200-0.10

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
31.5%
Passing plays
5.5%
Rushing plays
50.7%
Standard downs
39.0%
Passing downs
13.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.13
Passing downs
0.32
Pass / Rush EPA
0.43 / 0.13

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.090−0.7320222023
EPA per play · 2021 — 2023 · 34 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2021Wisconsin
3.1
67.9
2022Wisconsin
2.3
54.2
2023Wisconsin
2.8
58.5

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.