#7Benjamin Hall

RB·North Carolina·2025

Benjamin Hall is a Committee Back for North Carolina. Benjamin's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 79 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

Usage share (volume)0.52
Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
Total EPA (value)0.41
Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Benjamin Hall's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing

274 Rush yards2 Rush TD71 Carries3.9 Yards/carry

Receiving

8 Receptions34 Rec yards0 Rec TD4.3 Yards/rec

Returns

1 Kick returns24 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

Efficiency0
Volume38
Explosiveness18
Consistency0
Receiving67

Player type

Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg

Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg

Key findings

▸Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
▸High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
▸Production faded as the season progressed — 0.09 EPA/play decline from first to second half.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗

Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	Car	Rush Yds	Avg	Rush TD	Rec	Rec Yds	Rec TD	EPA/play
1	vsTCU	L14-48	8.3	6	22	3.7	0	—	—	—	-0.00
2	@Charlotte	W20-3	-26.7	3	3	1.0	0	2	10	0	-0.42
4	@UCF	L9-34	-1.2	6	19	3.2	0	—	—	—	0.25
6	vsClemson	L10-38	9.5	5	24	4.8	1	1	14	0	0.29
8	@California	L18-21	-3.2	14	68	4.9	1	2	0	0	-0.14
9	vsVirginia	L16-17	11.1	11	50	4.5	0	—	—	—	0.15
10	@Syracuse	W27-10	-13.1	5	17	3.4	0	—	—	—	-0.14
11	vsStanford	W20-15	-11.8	5	12	2.4	0	—	—	—	-0.08
12	@Wake Forest	L12-28	5.7	8	21	2.6	0	1	9	0	-0.27
13	vsDuke	L25-32	6.6	2	9	4.5	0	—	—	—	-0.02
14	@NC State	L19-42	4.8	6	29	4.8	0	2	1	0	0.04

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy

Overall

13.2%

Passing plays

4.9%

Rushing plays

23.4%

Standard downs

14.9%

Passing downs

9.4%

EPA by down type

Standard downs: -0.09
Passing downs: 0.06
Pass / Rush EPA: -0.21 / -0.03

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).