Skip to content
Avery Morrow

#25Avery Morrow

Avery Morrow is a Featured Back for Colorado State. Avery's 2024 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 194 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Avery Morrow's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2024 Production

Rushing
1006 Rush yards9 Rush TD184 Carries5.5 Yards/carry
Receiving
16 Receptions102 Rec yards0 Rec TD6.4 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume72
  • Explosiveness50
  • Consistency39
  • Receiving30
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency39th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.50 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.98 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs Colorado (SP+ 8).

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.9801.98Wk 2 vs Northern Colorado: +0.46 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Colorado: +1.98 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs UTEP: +0.52 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Oregon State: +0.22 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs San José State: +0.03 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Air Force: -0.08 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs New Mexico: -0.01 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Nevada: +0.25 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Wyoming: +0.27 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Fresno State: -0.35 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Utah State: -0.08 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
2vsNorthern ColoradoW38-175275.410.46
3vsColoradoL9-288.136722.301.98
4vsUTEPW27-17-22.7211567.4222000.52
6@Oregon StateL31-39-6.7251405.6132000.22
7vsSan José StateW31-24-5.5221004.5221000.03
8@Air ForceW21-13-11.7201326.60120-0.08
9vsNew MexicoW17-6-14.816895.601-20-0.01
10@NevadaW38-21-15.218774.3232000.25
12vsWyomingW24-10-13.613846.511800.27
13@Fresno StateL22-28-3.8242.00-0.35
14vsUtah StateW42-37-10.421803.80-0.08
20vsMiami (OH)L17-431.318502.803240

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
25.3%
Passing plays
4.2%
Rushing plays
42.9%
Standard downs
30.3%
Passing downs
14.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.02
Passing downs
0.44
Pass / Rush EPA
0.42 / 0.08

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.