#10Anthony Colandrea

QB·UNLV·20255.3 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Anthony Colandrea is a Dual-Threat QB for UNLV. Anthony's 2025 season ranks in the 28th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 528 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

Usage share (volume)0.46
Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
Total EPA (value)0.51
Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Anthony Colandrea's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Passing

275/417 Comp/Att3459 Pass yards23 Pass TD9 INT65.9% Comp %

Rushing

650 Rush yards10 Rush TD127 Carries5.1 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

Efficiency28
Volume100
Dual-Threat100
Consistency84
Clutch100

Player type

Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)28th %ile · below avg

Game-to-game consistency84th %ile · above avg

Key findings

▸Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
▸High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
▸High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
▸7 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
▸Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.15 from the first to second half of the season.
▸Peak game: 0.94 EPA/play in Wk 14 vs Nevada (SP+ -13).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗

Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	C/ATT	Pass Yds	Pass TD	INT	QBR	Rush Yds	Rush TD	EPA/play
0	vsIdaho State	W38-31	—	15/21	195	1	0	54.0	93	0	—
1	vsSam Houston	W38-21	-27.8	19/23	249	2	1	92.1	23	1	0.60
2	vsUCLA	W30-23	-8.7	15/21	203	3	0	84.4	59	0	0.58
4	@Miami (OH)	W41-38	-3.4	29/43	293	2	2	52.0	54	0	0.31
6	@Wyoming	W31-17	-11.3	11/20	102	1	0	27.0	32	0	0.23
7	vsAir Force	W51-48	-3.2	20/32	361	1	0	75.1	62	2	0.64
8	@Boise State	L31-56	3.1	18/30	215	2	1	75.9	87	1	-0.01
10	vsNew Mexico	L35-40	0.9	36/46	382	3	0	69.8	41	0	0.42
11	@Colorado State	W42-10	-15.6	15/22	251	2	1	70.8	33	2	0.78
12	vsUtah State	W29-26	-3.1	24/43	276	1	1	34.8	29	1	0.35
13	vsHawai'i	W38-10	1.7	21/26	253	3	0	92.0	16	0	0.57
14	@Nevada	W42-17	-13.4	15/22	270	1	2	97.0	27	1	0.94
15	@Boise State	L21-38	3.1	18/38	225	1	0	76.8	66	1	0.21
20	vsOhio	L10-17	-4.0	19/30	184	0	1	50.0	28	1	—

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy

Overall

58.1%

Passing plays

97.9%

Rushing plays

22.3%

Standard downs

51.2%

Passing downs

73.9%

EPA by down type

Standard downs: 0.29
Passing downs: 0.61
Pass / Rush EPA: 0.37 / 0.70

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg

EPA per play · 2025 · 14 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.