Skip to content
Aaron Anderson

#1Aaron Anderson

WR·LSU·2025

Aaron Anderson is a Versatile WR for LSU. Aaron's 2025 season produced 30.0 total EPA across 49 plays.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Aaron Anderson's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
33 Receptions398 Rec yards0 Rec TD12.1 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume25
  • Explosiveness34
  • Consistency78
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency78th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 1.99 EPA/play in Wk 8 vs Vanderbilt (SP+ 20).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Quadree HendersonPittsburgh0.5301.633.4
DeAndre HughesAir Force0.4701.328.2
Keytaon ThompsonMississippi State0.4601.232.2
Savion WilliamsTCU0.4501.125.2
Javion PoseyFlorida Atlantic0.4501.423.8

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.9901.99Wk 1 vs Clemson: +0.89 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Louisiana Tech: +0.77 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Florida: +0.46 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs SE Louisiana: +0.88 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Ole Miss: -0.01 EPA/play5Wk 8 vs Vanderbilt: +1.99 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Texas A&M: +0.64 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Alabama: +0.36 EPA/play11
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1@ClemsonW17-109.569916.50390.89
2vsLouisiana TechW23-7-1.38739.10230.77
3vsFloridaW20-103.547518.80310.46
4vsSE LouisianaW56-1034615.30250.88
5@Ole MissL19-2424.02126.007-0.01
8@VanderbiltL24-3120.311818.00181.99
9vsTexas A&ML25-4920.755911.80220.64
11@AlabamaL9-2014.84164.0090.36

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
8.8%
Passing plays
14.9%
Rushing plays
0.4%
Standard downs
7.9%
Passing downs
10.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.37
Passing downs
0.91
Pass / Rush EPA
0.63 / -0.31

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.