Skip to content

Zach Metsa vs Timothy Liljegren

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Timothy Liljegren is ahead on 8 of 12 measures. The widest gap is chances against per 60: Timothy Liljegren sits in the 79th percentile, Zach Metsa the 23rd.

MeasureMetsaLiljegren
Scoring · NHL
Points10
Goals00
Assists10
Ice time per game10:4118:00
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.001 pct0.0215 pct
Shot attempts per game0.01 pct1.533 pct
Goals above expected0.068 pct0.057 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share54.1%57 pct71.4%94 pct
Chances for per 603.4889 pct4.1097 pct
Chances against per 602.9523 pct1.6479 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60−0.0629 pct+0.0544 pct
Creates per 60−0.1319 pct+0.0849 pct
Prevents per 60+0.0760 pct−0.0337 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 519 skaters who have at least 18 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →