Travis Mitchell vs Marcus Foligno
Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.
2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far
Change first player
Ducks skaters
- Cutter Gauthier
- Beckett Sennecke
- Mikael Granlund
- A.J. Greer
- Ryan Poehling
- Leo Carlsson
- Jackson LaCombe
- Tristan Luneau
- Pavel Mintyukov
- Tyson Hinds
- Jeff Malott
- Alex Killorn
- Tim Washe
- Nikita Nesterenko
- Sam Colangelo
- Noah Warren
- Frank Vatrano
- Judd Caulfield
- Travis Mitchell
League chance leaders
- Leon Draisaitl
- Andrei Svechnikov
- Tomas Hertl
- Vasily Podkolzin
- Kyle Connor
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- Adrian Kempe
- Jordan Eberle
- William Eklund
- Nick Schmaltz
- Cole Perfetti
- Michael Brandsegg-Nygård
- Dylan Guenther
- Clayton Keller
- William Nylander
- Will Smith
- Alex Tuch
- Nathan MacKinnon
- Sebastian Aho
- Marco Rossi
- Kirill Kaprizov
- JJ Peterka
- Artemi Panarin
- Sam Reinhart
Another club (its chance leader)
Change second player
Wild skaters
- Kirill Kaprizov
- Matt Boldy
- Quinn Hughes
- Blake Coleman
- Joel Eriksson Ek
- Marcus Foligno
- Michael McCarron
- Maxim Shabanov
- Nick Foligno
- Yakov Trenin
- Danila Yurov
- Bobby Brink
- Ryan Hartman
- Olli Maatta
- Daemon Hunt
- Jared Spurgeon
- Zach Bogosian
- Jonas Brodin
League chance leaders
- Leon Draisaitl
- Andrei Svechnikov
- Tomas Hertl
- Vasily Podkolzin
- Kyle Connor
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- Adrian Kempe
- Jordan Eberle
- William Eklund
- Nick Schmaltz
- Cole Perfetti
- Michael Brandsegg-Nygård
- Dylan Guenther
- Clayton Keller
- William Nylander
- Will Smith
- Alex Tuch
- Nathan MacKinnon
- Sebastian Aho
- Marco Rossi
- Kirill Kaprizov
- JJ Peterka
- Artemi Panarin
- Sam Reinhart
Another club (its chance leader)
Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better
Marcus Foligno is ahead on 8 of 10 measures. The widest gap is net impact per 60: Marcus Foligno sits in the 94th percentile, Travis Mitchell the 7th.
| Measure | Mitchell | Foligno |
|---|---|---|
| Scoring · NHL | ||
| Points | 0 | 0 |
| Goals | 0 | 0 |
| Assists | 0 | 0 |
| Ice time per game | 17:23 | 12:10 |
| His chances · ours | ||
| Expected goals per game | 0.001 pct | 0.1865 pct |
| Shot attempts per game | 0.01 pct | 1.533 pct |
| Goals above expected | 0.068 pct | −0.420 pct |
| With him on the ice · ours | ||
| Chance share | 40.3%26 pct | 60.3%73 pct |
| Chances for per 60 | 1.6822 pct | 2.1343 pct |
| Chances against per 60 | 2.5040 pct | 1.4088 pct |
| 5-on-5 impact · ours | ||
| Net impact per 60 | −0.367 pct | +0.6694 pct |
| Creates per 60 | −0.382 pct | +0.2876 pct |
| Prevents per 60 | +0.0247 pct | +0.3897 pct |
How this is measured
Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.
Percentiles compare each skater with the 519 skaters who have at least 18 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →










































