Skip to content

Luca Cagnoni vs Mika Zibanejad

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Mika Zibanejad is ahead on 9 of 12 measures. The widest gap is chances for per 60: Mika Zibanejad sits in the 64th percentile, Luca Cagnoni the 3rd.

MeasureCagnoniZibanejad
Scoring · NHL
Points23
Goals11
Assists12
Ice time per game21:1920:49
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.2475 pct0.2476 pct
Shot attempts per game4.087 pct2.560 pct
Goals above expected+0.580 pct0.070 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share24.6%5 pct57.1%64 pct
Chances for per 600.893 pct2.6964 pct
Chances against per 602.7431 pct2.0261 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60−0.454 pct−0.0433 pct
Creates per 60−0.334 pct−0.0430 pct
Prevents per 60−0.1220 pct+0.0144 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 519 skaters who have at least 18 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →