Skip to content

Anton Johansson vs Blake Coleman

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Blake Coleman is ahead on 11 of 12 measures. The widest gap is net impact per 60: Blake Coleman sits in the 88th percentile, Anton Johansson the 26th.

MeasureJohanssonColeman
Scoring · NHL
Points01
Goals01
Assists00
Ice time per game16:2013:39
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.0319 pct0.2273 pct
Shot attempts per game0.57 pct2.560 pct
Goals above expected−0.153 pct+0.681 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share36.9%18 pct53.8%57 pct
Chances for per 601.5618 pct2.9171 pct
Chances against per 602.6734 pct2.4940 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60−0.0826 pct+0.5188 pct
Creates per 60−0.0333 pct+0.4590 pct
Prevents per 60−0.0533 pct+0.0658 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 519 skaters who have at least 18 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →