Skip to content

Ethan Del Mastro vs Chris Tanev

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Chris Tanev is ahead on 5 of 7 measures. The widest gap is net impact per 60: Chris Tanev sits in the 70th percentile, Ethan Del Mastro the 5th.

MeasureMastroTanev
Scoring · NHL
Points00
Goals00
Assists00
Ice time per game15:0118:55
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.0425 pct0.015 pct
Shot attempts per game1.018 pct0.33 pct
Goals above expected0.059 pct0.063 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share—39.1%23 pct
Chances for per 60—1.9536 pct
Chances against per 60—3.0421 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60−0.415 pct+0.2970 pct
Creates per 60−0.472 pct−0.2112 pct
Prevents per 60+0.0657 pct+0.4999 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 519 skaters who have at least 18 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →