Skip to content

Jesper Bratt vs Frank Vatrano

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Jesper Bratt is ahead on 8 of 9 measures. The widest gap is net impact per 60: Jesper Bratt sits in the 96th percentile, Frank Vatrano the 2nd.

MeasureBrattVatrano
Scoring · NHL
Points10
Goals00
Assists10
Ice time per game18:3510:34
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.3892 pct0.001 pct
Shot attempts per game4.591 pct0.01 pct
Goals above expected−0.85 pct0.068 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share73.4%95 pct—
Chances for per 604.5198 pct—
Chances against per 601.6379 pct—
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60+0.7596 pct−0.522 pct
Creates per 60+0.7298 pct+0.0140 pct
Prevents per 60+0.0350 pct−0.531 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 519 skaters who have at least 18 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →