Skip to content

Garnet Hathaway vs Emil Lilleberg

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Garnet Hathaway and Emil Lilleberg split the measures 3 each. The widest gap is net impact per 60: Garnet Hathaway sits in the 86th percentile, Emil Lilleberg the 8th.

MeasureHathawayLilleberg
Scoring · NHL
Points00
Goals00
Assists00
Ice time per game8:2310:30
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.0424 pct0.0737 pct
Shot attempts per game1.018 pct1.018 pct
Goals above expected−0.144 pct−0.153 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share69.0%91 pct—
Chances for per 601.179 pct—
Chances against per 600.5399 pct—
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60+0.4986 pct−0.348 pct
Creates per 60−0.1022 pct−0.383 pct
Prevents per 60+0.6099 pct+0.0351 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 519 skaters who have at least 18 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →