Skip to content

Nathan MacKinnon vs Chris Tanev

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Nathan MacKinnon is ahead on 11 of 13 measures. The widest gap is shot attempts per game: Nathan MacKinnon sits in the 99th percentile, Chris Tanev the 3rd.

MeasureMacKinnonTanev
Scoring · NHL
Points50
Goals20
Assists30
Ice time per game18:0018:55
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.6498 pct0.015 pct
Shot attempts per game7.599 pct0.33 pct
Goals above expected+0.786 pct0.063 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share63.4%82 pct39.1%23 pct
Chances for per 603.4889 pct1.9536 pct
Chances against per 602.0161 pct3.0421 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60+1.2199 pct+0.2970 pct
Creates per 60+1.2599 pct−0.2112 pct
Prevents per 60−0.0335 pct+0.4999 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 519 skaters who have at least 18 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →