Skip to content

Blake Coleman vs Ivar Stenberg

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Blake Coleman is ahead on 9 of 12 measures. The widest gap is chances for per 60: Blake Coleman sits in the 71st percentile, Ivar Stenberg the 4th.

MeasureColemanStenberg
Scoring · NHL
Points11
Goals10
Assists01
Ice time per game13:3914:36
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.2273 pct0.0318 pct
Shot attempts per game2.560 pct0.57 pct
Goals above expected+0.681 pct−0.154 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share53.8%57 pct34.1%14 pct
Chances for per 602.9171 pct0.924 pct
Chances against per 602.4940 pct1.7971 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60+0.5188 pct+0.0137 pct
Creates per 60+0.4590 pct−0.0137 pct
Prevents per 60+0.0658 pct+0.0349 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 519 skaters who have at least 18 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →