Skip to content

Oliver Ekman-Larsson vs Teddy Blueger

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Oliver Ekman-Larsson is ahead on 9 of 10 measures. The widest gap is chance share: Oliver Ekman-Larsson sits in the 71st percentile, Teddy Blueger the 1st.

MeasureEkman-LarssonBlueger
Scoring · NHL
Points00
Goals00
Assists00
Ice time per game16:5510:54
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.0423 pct0.0425 pct
Shot attempts per game1.327 pct1.018 pct
Goals above expected−0.144 pct−0.142 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share59.3%71 pct8.9%1 pct
Chances for per 602.8970 pct0.541 pct
Chances against per 601.9863 pct5.511 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60−0.0728 pct−0.2612 pct
Creates per 60−0.0923 pct−0.1715 pct
Prevents per 60+0.0350 pct−0.0925 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 519 skaters who have at least 18 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →