Skip to content
Utah Hockey Club at Jets
NHL

Utah Mammoth at Winnipeg Jets

FinalTV Utah16, TSN3·Canada Life Centre

Recap

written from the game data

The Winnipeg Jets beat the Utah Mammoth 5-2. The Jets scored first and never trailed. The Jets led 2-1 after two periods. The biggest swing in win probability was Cole Perfetti's goal at 5:51 of the third period, which took the Jets' chances from 52% to 79%. Expected goals favored the Jets, 3.7 to 1.8; shots on goal were UTA 19, WPG 29. With league-average goaltending at both ends, the Jets win a replay of these chances 68% of the time. Connor Ingram stopped 24 of 28 (.857), 1.2 goals below expected; Connor Hellebuyck stopped 17 of 19 (.895). Three stars: 1. Cole Perfetti (3 G), 2. Nikolaj Ehlers (1 G, 2 A), 3. Dylan DeMelo (2 A).

Three stars

  1. ★
    WPG
    C. Perfetti3 G
  2. ★★
    WPG
    N. Ehlers1 G, 2 A
  3. ★★★
    WPG
    D. DeMelo2 A

Line score

goals · shots on goal beneath
Goals and shots on goal by period
Team1st2nd3rdT
UTAUTA051915219
WPGWPG11011138529

Scoring

7 goals

1st period

  1. WPG
    snapxG 0.11win prob +11 ptsVideo
    0-1
    17:52

2nd period

  1. UTA
    tip-inxG 0.09win prob +14 ptsVideo
    1-1
    1:13
  2. WPG
    snapxG 0.12win prob +18 ptsVideo
    1-2
    8:48

3rd period

  1. UTA
    wristxG 0.04win prob +24 ptsVideo
    2-2
    1:19
  2. WPG
    snapxG 0.45win prob +27 ptsVideo
    2-3
    5:51
  3. WPG
    Unassisted
    backhandxG 0.14win prob +12 ptsVideo
    2-4
    12:16
  4. WPG
    N. Ehlers (28), N. Pionk (25)
    wristxG 0.92win prob +1 ptsVideo
    2-5
    18:15

Penalties

UTA 2 PIM·WPG 6 PIM

1st

  • 17:04UTAMatias Maccelli · Holdingdrawn by Mason Appleton2 min
  • 19:46WPGGabriel Vilardi · Slashingdrawn by Barrett Hayton2 min

2nd

  • 15:17WPGDylan DeMelo · Interferencedrawn by Logan Cooley2 min

3rd

  • 18:41WPGMorgan Barron · Trippingdrawn by Juuso Välimäki2 min

Win probability

ours · the whole game
Tap or hover the chart for the moment-by-moment number
WPG goalUTA goalFinal: WPG 100%

Biggest swing: Cole Perfetti, 3rd 5:51 — WPG 52% → 79%

Shot map

unblocked attempts · size = our xG
C. Perfetti · Goal · xG 0.92C. Perfetti · Goal · xG 0.45M. Scheifele · On goal · xG 0.23N. Niederreiter · Missed · xG 0.14N. Ehlers · Goal · xG 0.14D. Gustafsson · Goal · xG 0.12N. Niederreiter · On goal · xG 0.12C. Perfetti · Goal · xG 0.11G. Vilardi · Missed · xG 0.11M. Barron · Missed · xG 0.09M. Scheifele · Missed · xG 0.08C. Perfetti · On goal · xG 0.08M. Barron · Missed · xG 0.07M. Appleton · Missed · xG 0.07R. Kupari · Missed · xG 0.07D. DeMelo · On goal · xG 0.07N. Ehlers · Missed · xG 0.06L. Stanley · On goal · xG 0.06N. Niederreiter · Missed · xG 0.06M. Appleton · On goal · xG 0.06M. Scheifele · Missed · xG 0.05M. Appleton · Missed · xG 0.05J. Morrissey · On goal · xG 0.04N. Niederreiter · Missed · xG 0.04A. Iafallo · On goal · xG 0.04N. Pionk · Missed · xG 0.04M. Barron · Missed · xG 0.03K. Connor · On goal · xG 0.03H. Fleury · On goal · xG 0.02C. Perfetti · Missed · xG 0.02N. Pionk · On goal · xG 0.02G. Vilardi · Missed · xG 0.02D. DeMelo · On goal · xG 0.02R. Kupari · On goal · xG 0.02M. Appleton · Missed · xG 0.02M. Barron · Missed · xG 0.02N. Ehlers · On goal · xG 0.02H. Fleury · On goal · xG 0.01M. Scheifele · Missed · xG 0.01D. Samberg · Missed · xG 0.01N. Pionk · Missed · xG 0.01H. Fleury · On goal · xG 0.01N. Pionk · Missed · xG 0.01D. DeMelo · On goal · xG 0.01N. Pionk · On goal · xG 0.01D. Samberg · On goal · xG 0.01N. Pionk · On goal · xG 0.01M. Appleton · On goal · xG 0.01N. Ehlers · On goal · xG 0.00M. Appleton · Missed · xG 0.00N. Ehlers · On goal · xG 0.00D. Samberg · On goal · xG 0.00
WPG5 G · 3.7 xG · 52 att
Tap a shot for who, when and how likely
GoalOn goalMissedBigger = higher xG

Expected goals

UTAvsWPG
1.82 G
All situations
4 G3.7
1.51 G
Even strength
3 G2.6
0.31 G
Power play
1 G0.1
0.00 G
Shorthanded
0 G0.1

Expected goals: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, from our shot model, summed. 87 unblocked attempts. Empty-net goals are left out of the goal counts.

Deserve to win

on the chances created
UTA32%68%WPG

Flurry-adjusted xG 1.84 – 2.80

How often each side wins a replay of these chances with league-average goaltending at both ends. Rebounds in a flurry are counted once, so a scramble is not three chances.

Team stats

UTAvsWPG
19
Shots on goal
29
45%
Faceoffs
55%
1/3
Power play
1/1
2
Penalty minutes
6
12
Hits
24
15
Blocked shots
12
25
Giveaways
20
4
Takeaways
6

Box score

every player line
Utah Mammoth skaters
SkaterGAP+/-SOGixGHitBlkPIMFO%TOI
92L. CooleyC000-130.100004022:57
6J. MarinoD011-110.01210—22:56
7M. KesselringD011-210.05010—22:35
9C. KellerR022-110.49010—22:27
8N. SchmaltzC101010.230102921:54
2O. MaattaD000+110.06030—20:51
28I. ColeD000-300.00010—18:28
91J. DoanR000010.07010—16:27
4J. VälimäkiD000000.04210—15:40
57N. DeSimoneD000-110.04120—15:08
15A. KerfootC000-110.061006014:38
27B. HaytonC101020.270005614:13
67L. CrouseL000-110.08010—13:28
17N. BjugstadC000-110.191106712:54
22J. McBainC000000.003003812:18
82K. StenlundC000-220.120105711:44
63M. MaccelliL000-210.03102—11:18
53M. CarconeL000-110.02100—10:25
Utah Mammoth goalies
GoalieSASVGASV%xGAGSAxTOI
39C. Ingram(L)28244.8572.81-1.1958:51

Season series

Data: NHL. Model: Gridpex (expected goals and win probability built on NHL play-by-play).