Lehigh vs. Merrimack: Final Score & Recap
Final score, recap & advanced stats

Lehigh0-1
▸
Merrimack
Final
Duane Stadium
LEHITeam statsMERR
329Total yards276
260Pass90
69Rush186
17First downs15
2-143rd down1-14
2Turnovers1
27:37Possession32:23
- Q3 5:04MERRGavin McCusker 2 Yd Run (Two-Point Run Conversion Failed)14–12
- Q2 0:00MERRLliam Davis 46 Yd Field Goal 14–6
- Q2 0:02LEHIConnor Kennedy 8 Yd pass from Brayten Silbor (Nick Garrido Kick)14–3
- Q2 0:56LEHIConnor Kennedy 6 Yd pass from Brayten Silbor (Nick Garrido Kick)7–3
- Q1 7:17MERRLliam Davis 32 Yd Field Goal 0–3
What the numbers say
- LEHI played behind the sticks — third downs that long convert rarely, and MERR did not face the same ones. 3rd & 7.0 vs 3rd & 3.5
Kickoff70 plays →Final
Tap or hover on the chart to see play details
MERR (top)LEHI (bottom)· colored dots = scoresFinal: MERR 0%
Lehigh
- PassBrayten Silbor 20/40, 260 YDS, 2 TD, 1 INT
- RushGaige Garcia 14 CAR, 71 YDS
- RecGeoffrey Jamiel 4 REC, 72 YDS
Merrimack
- PassGavin McCusker 10/27, 90 YDS
- RushTyvon Edmonds Jr. 23 CAR, 140 YDS
- RecLJ Robinson 3 REC, 40 YDS
54sper snap · slower the national 24.5s
fastnational avgslow
Snaps run
50
Points / snap
0.52
This exact spot, historically
empirical, no ratingsLEHI up 2 entering the 4th quarter. Across 1,934 historically comparable game states (within ±2 pts and ±3 min, from 3,056 games):
57%
LEHI went on to win
A genuinely vulnerable lead — comebacks are common
FAQ
What was the final score of Lehigh vs. Merrimack?
Lehigh 14, Merrimack 12.
Did Gridpex's model pick hit?
No — the model picked MERR, which didn't hit. We report the misses too.
LEHI
MERR
44%
Success rate
39%
-0.05
EPA / pass
-0.58
0.08
EPA / rush
0.44
44%
Early-down success
46%
43%
Pass success
14%
46%
Rush success
55%
16%
Explosive play rate (15+ yds)
17%
9%
Stuffed rush rate
9%
66%
Pass rate
39%
7.0
Avg 3rd-down distance
3.5
LEHI
7.0 yards to go on 3rd down
32 scrimmage snaps
MERR
3.5 yards to go on 3rd down
18 scrimmage snaps
| LEHI | MERR | |
|---|---|---|
| 329 | Total yards | 276 |
| 260 | Passing yards | 90 |
| 69 | Rushing yards | 186 |
| 17 | First downs | 15 |
| 2-14 | 3rd down | 1-14 |
| 1-1 | 4th down | 1-3 |
| 20/41 | Comp/Att | 10/27 |
| 6.3 | Yards per pass | 3.3 |
| 2.9 | Yards per rush | 4.3 |
| 2 | Turnovers | 1 |
| 7-55 | Penalties | 6-60 |
| 27:37 | Possession | 32:23 |
LEHI
6/9 with the model
−1.8 pts · −0.0% win prob
MERR
8/12 with the model
−1.5 pts · −0.0% win prob
Costliest call
Q2 13:51 LEHI punt on 4th & 1 at MERR 49. The model preferred go for it, a gap of 1.60 points.
Drive chart
every possession, start to finishLEHI 1/13 scoring drives← own end zone →MERR 1/15 scoring drives
MERRPUNT7 pl, 23 yds· own 40Q1
LEHIPUNT4 pl, 0 yds· own 10Q1
MERRFG6 pl, 37 yds· own 48Q1
LEHIPUNT5 pl, 17 yds· own 18Q1
MERRPUNT3 pl, -3 yds· own 33Q1
LEHIPUNT5 pl, 20 yds· own 31Q1
MERRPUNT3 pl, 6 yds· own 10Q1
LEHIPUNT3 pl, 9 yds· own 42Q1
MERRPUNT10 pl, 52 yds· own 3Q2
LEHIINT6 pl, 53 yds· own 20Q2
MERRPUNT3 pl, 2 yds· own 21Q2
LEHIPUNT3 pl, 5 yds· own 26Q2
MERRPUNT3 pl, 3 yds· own 26Q2
LEHITD6 pl, 71 yds· own 29Q2
MERRPUNT3 pl, 2 yds· own 16Q2
MERRFG1 pl, 0 yds· opp 29Q2
LEHIPUNT9 pl, 26 yds· own 24Q3
MERRTD13 pl, 87 yds· own 13Q3
LEHIINT6 pl, 70 yds· own 25Q3
MERRPUNT3 pl, 8 yds· own 38Q3
LEHIPUNT6 pl, 25 yds· own 20Q3
MERRDOWNS8 pl, 45 yds· own 20Q4
LEHIPUNT3 pl, -4 yds· own 35Q4
MERRPUNT3 pl, 7 yds· own 33Q4
LEHIPUNT6 pl, 7 yds· own 23Q4
MERRDOWNS6 pl, 10 yds· own 39Q4
LEHIPUNT4 pl, -4 yds· opp 49Q4
MERRFUM2 pl, 0 yds· own 18Q4
- Q3 5:04MERRGavin McCusker 2 Yd Run (Two-Point Run Conversion Failed)14–12
- Q2 0:00MERRLliam Davis 46 Yd Field Goal 14–6
- Q2 0:02LEHIConnor Kennedy 8 Yd pass from Brayten Silbor (Nick Garrido Kick)14–3
- Q2 0:56LEHIConnor Kennedy 6 Yd pass from Brayten Silbor (Nick Garrido Kick)7–3
- Q1 7:17MERRLliam Davis 32 Yd Field Goal 0–3
Model prediction
how the number is builtOne or both teams lack a power rating (often an FCS opponent), so the model prediction is low-confidence for this game.
Where this number comes from. Every projection on this page is produced by the same model, run before kickoff on opponent-adjusted efficiency, power ratings and situational data — walk-forward validated on eleven seasons and never adjusted after the fact. How the model works →
