Villanova vs. Penn State: Final Score & Recap
Final score, recap & advanced stats

Villanova

Penn State2-0
▸Final
Beaver Stadium
VILLTeam statsPSU
179Total yards465
96Pass228
83Rush237
11First downs28
6-173rd down5-11
2Turnovers1
31:44Possession28:16
- Q4 0:00VILLBrandon Binkowski 8 Yd pass from Tanner Maddocks 6–52
- Q4 6:24PSUJahmir Joseph 49 Yd Interception Return (Ryan Barker Kick)0–52
- Q4 7:05PSUJoey Schlaffer 19 Yd pass from Ethan Grunkemeyer (Ryan Barker Kick)0–45
- Q4 10:43PSUKaytron Allen 18 Yd Run (Ryan Barker Kick)0–38
- Q3 3:36PSUNicholas Singleton 3 Yd Run (Ryan Barker Kick)0–31
- Q3 10:02PSURyan Barker 42 Yd Field Goal 0–24
- Q2 0:32PSUTrebor Pena 23 Yd pass from Drew Allar (Drew Allar Pass to Trebor Pena for Two-Point Conversion)0–21
- Q2 6:39PSURyan Barker 28 Yd Field Goal 0–13
- Q2 14:22PSURyan Barker 45 Yd Field Goal 0–10
- Q1 8:48PSUNicholas Singleton 4 Yd Run (Ryan Barker Kick)0–7
How the model called it
Market line
PSU −47
Against the number
VILL covered
line PSU −47
Kickoff110 plays →Final
Tap or hover on the chart to see play details
PSU (top)VILL (bottom)· colored dots = scoresFinal: PSU 100%
Closing line
PSU −47
Closing total
57.0
Model line
—
Actual result
VILL 6 – 52 PSU
Villanova
- PassTanner Maddocks 6/12, 69 YDS, 1 TD, 1 INT
- RushDavid Avit 10 CAR, 53 YDS
- RecBraden Reed 2 REC, 41 YDS
Penn State
- PassDrew Allar 16/29, 209 YDS, 1 TD, 1 INT
- RushKaytron Allen 10 CAR, 86 YDS, 1 TD
- RecLuke Reynolds 4 REC, 73 YDS
This exact spot, historically
empirical, no ratingsPSU up 31 entering the 4th quarter. Across 343 historically comparable game states (within ±2 pts and ±3 min, from 3,056 games):
100%
PSU went on to win
A near-lock historically
FAQ
What was the final score of Villanova vs. Penn State?
Villanova 6, Penn State 52.
Did Gridpex's model pick hit?
Yes — the model's pick (PSU) was correct.
VILL
PSU
34%
Success rate
54%
-0.14
EPA / pass
0.09
-0.29
EPA / rush
0.46
29%
Early-down success
55%
36%
Pass success
48%
32%
Rush success
59%
5%
Explosive play rate (15+ yds)
14%
36%
Stuffed rush rate
7%
50%
Pass rate
42%
6.8
Avg 3rd-down distance
5.0
VILL
6.8 yards to go on 3rd down
44 scrimmage snaps
PSU
5.0 yards to go on 3rd down
50 scrimmage snaps
| VILL | PSU | |
|---|---|---|
| 179 | Total yards | 465 |
| 96 | Passing yards | 228 |
| 83 | Rushing yards | 237 |
| 11 | First downs | 28 |
| 6-17 | 3rd down | 5-11 |
| 2-2 | 4th down | 1-1 |
| 13/27 | Comp/Att | 17/31 |
| 3.6 | Yards per pass | 7.4 |
| 2.3 | Yards per rush | 6.2 |
| 2 | Turnovers | 1 |
| 4-29 | Penalties | 5-25 |
| 31:44 | Possession | 28:16 |
VILL
6/6 with the model
nothing given up
PSU
2/4 with the model
−0.2 pts · −0.0% win prob
Costliest call
Q3 10:02 PSU field goal on 4th & 4 at VILL 25. The model preferred go for it, a gap of 0.12 points.
Drive chart
every possession, start to finishVILL 2/9 scoring drives← own end zone →PSU 6/8 scoring drives
PSUTD12 pl, 78 yds· own 22Q1
VILLPUNT5 pl, 15 yds· own 19Q1
PSUPUNT6 pl, 31 yds· own 25Q1
VILLPUNT3 pl, -3 yds· own 8Q1
PSUFG4 pl, 4 yds· opp 32Q2
VILLPUNT3 pl, -1 yds· own 13Q3
PSUFG7 pl, 23 yds· opp 48Q3
VILLINT1 pl, 0 yds· own 25Q3
PSUINT3 pl, 12 yds· opp 23Q3
VILLPUNT3 pl, 1 yds· own 17Q3
PSUTD9 pl, 59 yds· own 41Q3
VILLPUNT8 pl, 16 yds· own 30Q3
PSUTD7 pl, 84 yds· own 16Q4
VILLPUNT3 pl, 2 yds· own 1Q4
PSUTD4 pl, 35 yds· opp 35Q4
VILLTD2 pl, 12 yds· own 25Q4
VILLEND16 pl, 75 yds· own 1Q4
- Q4 0:00VILLBrandon Binkowski 8 Yd pass from Tanner Maddocks 6–52
- Q4 6:24PSUJahmir Joseph 49 Yd Interception Return (Ryan Barker Kick)0–52
- Q4 7:05PSUJoey Schlaffer 19 Yd pass from Ethan Grunkemeyer (Ryan Barker Kick)0–45
- Q4 10:43PSUKaytron Allen 18 Yd Run (Ryan Barker Kick)0–38
- Q3 3:36PSUNicholas Singleton 3 Yd Run (Ryan Barker Kick)0–31
- Q3 10:02PSURyan Barker 42 Yd Field Goal 0–24
- Q2 0:32PSUTrebor Pena 23 Yd pass from Drew Allar (Drew Allar Pass to Trebor Pena for Two-Point Conversion)0–21
- Q2 6:39PSURyan Barker 28 Yd Field Goal 0–13
- Q2 14:22PSURyan Barker 45 Yd Field Goal 0–10
- Q1 8:48PSUNicholas Singleton 4 Yd Run (Ryan Barker Kick)0–7
Model prediction
how the number is builtOne or both teams lack a power rating (often an FCS opponent), so the model prediction is low-confidence for this game.
Where this number comes from. Every projection on this page is produced by the same model, run before kickoff on opponent-adjusted efficiency, power ratings and situational data — walk-forward validated on eleven seasons and never adjusted after the fact. How the model works →
