Sat, Nov 29, 8:30 PM
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PSU | 14 | 10 | 9 | 7 | 40 |
| RUTG | 14 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 36 |
Our model blends Elo ratings (RUTG Elo 1445, PSU Elo 1975) plus home-field advantage. That projects RUTG +18.8 (8% to win) — 4.8 points of value on PSU versus the market line of +14.
PSU up 5 entering the 4th quarter. Across 1,967 historically comparable game states (within ±2 pts and ±3 min, from 3,056 games):
Penn State 40, Rutgers 36.
Yes — the model's pick (PSU) was correct.
Why trust the number?Gridpex's model is walk-forward validated on 2014–24, out-of-sample: +0.28 pts mean Closing Line Value and 53.5% beat the close. We report the record — wins and losses — never fake locks.
Called it — I had PSU pregame. ✓ We log the misses too, but not this one.