Northern Colorado vs. Colorado State: Final Score & Recap
Final score, recap & advanced stats

Northern Colorado

Colorado State0-1
▸Final
Canvas Stadium
NORTTeam statsCSU
223Total yards371
160Pass141
63Rush230
17First downs27
3-143rd down5-10
2Turnovers5
29:23Possession30:37
- Q4 0:44CSUBrayden Fowler-Nicolosi 13 Yd Run (Isaiah Hankins Kick)17–21
- Q3 1:25CSULloyd Avant 6 Yd Run (Isaiah Hankins Kick)17–14
- Q3 7:14NORTAliou-Rocco Traore 1 Yd Run (Jacob Willig Kick)17–7
- Q3 13:23CSULloyd Avant 2 Yd Run (Isaiah Hankins Kick)10–7
- Q2 7:12NORTJacob Willig 23 Yd Field Goal 10–0
- Q1 6:37NORTKia'i Keone 1 Yd Run (Jacob Willig Kick)7–0
How the model called it
Market line
CSU −34.5
Against the number
NORT covered
line CSU −34.5
Kickoff159 plays →Final
Tap or hover on the chart to see play details
CSU (top)NORT (bottom)· colored dots = scoresFinal: CSU 100%
Closing line
CSU −34.5
Closing total
52.5
Model line
—
Actual result
NORT 17 – 21 CSU
Northern Colorado
- PassEric Gibson Jr. 17/28, 160 YDS, 1 INT
- RushJustin Guin 11 CAR, 38 YDS
- RecCarver Cheeks 5 REC, 54 YDS
Colorado State
- PassBrayden Fowler-Nicolosi 13/25, 132 YDS, 1 INT
- RushLloyd Avant 11 CAR, 68 YDS, 2 TD
- RecArmani Winfield 4 REC, 49 YDS
3.5sper snap · faster the national 24.5s
fastnational avgslow
Snaps run
139
Points / snap
0.27
This exact spot, historically
empirical, no ratingsNORT up 3 entering the 4th quarter. Across 1,457 historically comparable game states (within ±2 pts and ±3 min, from 3,056 games):
61%
NORT went on to win
A genuinely vulnerable lead — comebacks are common
FAQ
What was the final score of Northern Colorado vs. Colorado State?
Northern Colorado 17, Colorado State 21.
Did Gridpex's model pick hit?
Yes — the model's pick (CSU) was correct.
NORT
CSU
32%
Success rate
56%
0.13
EPA / pass
0.03
-0.24
EPA / rush
0.20
33%
Early-down success
58%
42%
Pass success
41%
23%
Rush success
66%
11%
Explosive play rate (15+ yds)
8%
37%
Stuffed rush rate
7%
47%
Pass rate
40%
5.9
Avg 3rd-down distance
6.7
NORT
5.9 yards to go on 3rd down
66 scrimmage snaps
CSU
6.7 yards to go on 3rd down
73 scrimmage snaps
| NORT | CSU | |
|---|---|---|
| 223 | Total yards | 371 |
| 160 | Passing yards | 141 |
| 63 | Rushing yards | 230 |
| 17 | First downs | 27 |
| 3-14 | 3rd down | 5-10 |
| 2-2 | 4th down | 0-1 |
| 17/28 | Comp/Att | 14/26 |
| 5.7 | Yards per pass | 5.4 |
| 1.9 | Yards per rush | 5.0 |
| 2 | Turnovers | 5 |
| 5-44 | Penalties | 10-94 |
| 29:23 | Possession | 30:37 |
NORT
6/9 with the model
−0.3 pts · −0.0% win prob
CSU
4/4 with the model
nothing given up
Costliest call
Q1 11:29 NORT punt on 4th & 3 at NORT 27. The model preferred go for it, a gap of 0.09 points.
Drive chart
every possession, start to finishNORT 3/13 scoring drives← own end zone →CSU 3/10 scoring drives
CSUPUNT3 pl, 19 yds· own 25Q1
NORTPUNT3 pl, 7 yds· own 20Q1
CSUFUM4 pl, 6 yds· own 33Q1
NORTTD7 pl, 39 yds· opp 39Q1
CSUMISS8 pl, 46 yds· own 25Q1
NORTPUNT3 pl, 4 yds· own 29Q1
CSUINT7 pl, 24 yds· own 30Q1
NORTPUNT9 pl, 33 yds· own 18Q2
NORTFG4 pl, 6 yds· opp 12Q2
CSUDOWNS12 pl, 60 yds· own 25Q2
NORTPUNT3 pl, -1 yds· own 15Q2
NORTEND2 pl, 31 yds· own 25Q2
NORTFUM2 pl, 2 yds· own 25Q3
CSUTD2 pl, 12 yds· opp 12Q3
NORTTD13 pl, 75 yds· own 25Q3
CSUTD11 pl, 75 yds· own 25Q3
NORTPUNT5 pl, 25 yds· own 25Q3
CSUPUNT7 pl, 4 yds· own 1Q4
NORTPUNT3 pl, 3 yds· own 37Q4
CSUFUM6 pl, 51 yds· own 24Q4
NORTPUNT3 pl, 5 yds· own 40Q4
CSUTD13 pl, 77 yds· own 23Q4
NORTINT6 pl, 47 yds· own 25Q4
- Q4 0:44CSUBrayden Fowler-Nicolosi 13 Yd Run (Isaiah Hankins Kick)17–21
- Q3 1:25CSULloyd Avant 6 Yd Run (Isaiah Hankins Kick)17–14
- Q3 7:14NORTAliou-Rocco Traore 1 Yd Run (Jacob Willig Kick)17–7
- Q3 13:23CSULloyd Avant 2 Yd Run (Isaiah Hankins Kick)10–7
- Q2 7:12NORTJacob Willig 23 Yd Field Goal 10–0
- Q1 6:37NORTKia'i Keone 1 Yd Run (Jacob Willig Kick)7–0
Model prediction
how the number is builtOne or both teams lack a power rating (often an FCS opponent), so the model prediction is low-confidence for this game.
Where this number comes from. Every projection on this page is produced by the same model, run before kickoff on opponent-adjusted efficiency, power ratings and situational data — walk-forward validated on eleven seasons and never adjusted after the fact. How the model works →
