Compare College Basketball Teams
How would two teams match up, by how much, and at what pace — and where does each rank?
2025-26 seasonthrough ratings as of 2026-04-06most recent completed season — 2026-27 has no ratings yet
Team 1: McNeese change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
Team 2: North Carolina change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
On a neutral floor the ratings make North Carolina a 2.5-point favourite at about 70 possessions; at McNeese it is +0.8, at North Carolina -5.9 (from McNeese's side).
- Neutral
- -2.5
- 70.1 poss.
- At McNeese
- +0.8
- 70.1 poss.
- At North Carolina
- -5.9
- 70.1 poss.
Margins are from McNeese's side, from the snapshot of 2026-04-06.
| Metric |  McNeese |  North Carolina |
|---|---|---|
| Adjusted efficiency margin | +12.249 | +15.828 |
| Adjusted offence | 112.769 | 115.249 |
| Adjusted defence | 100.544 | 99.333 |
| Adjusted tempo | 69.6203 | 70.6157 |
| Raw offence | 112.968 | 112.869 |
| Raw defence | 99.130 | 102.877 |
| Effective FG% | 50.7%206 | 54.6%50 |
| Turnover rate | 13.1%23 | 13.4%34 |
| Offensive rebound rate | 144.3%51 | 101.8%152 |
| Free-throw rate | 37.4%118 | 37.8%107 |
| Opponent eFG% | 49.3%75 | 48.3%42 |
| Opponent turnover rate | 22.0%1 | 12.5%344 |
| Defensive rebound rate | -58.6%318 | 6.0%188 |
| Opponent free-throw rate | 42.1%323 | 23.4%3 |
| Three-point attempt rate | 35.2%266 | 42.2%132 |
| Raw tempo | 68.1268 | 70.6145 |
How this is measured
The projection is the existing projectMargin from lib/cbb/ratings: (AdjEM difference ± the fitted home advantage) × expected possessions ÷ 100, with pace the mean of the two adjusted tempos. It uses the latest snapshot, so it describes the two teams as rated on 2026-04-06 — it is not a line and it is not graded here.
Ranks are out of 364 rated teams, 1 = best; bold marks the better of the two where a metric has a better end.