Compare College Basketball Teams
How would two teams match up, by how much, and at what pace — and where does each rank?
2025-26 seasonthrough ratings as of 2026-04-06most recent completed season — 2026-27 has no ratings yet
Team 1: North Carolina change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
Team 2: Hofstra change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
On a neutral floor the ratings make North Carolina a 4.3-point favourite at about 69 possessions; at North Carolina it is +7.6, at Hofstra +1.0 (from North Carolina's side).
- Neutral
- +4.3
- 69.0 poss.
- At North Carolina
- +7.6
- 69.0 poss.
- At Hofstra
- +1.0
- 69.0 poss.
Margins are from North Carolina's side, from the snapshot of 2026-04-06.
| Metric |  North Carolina |  Hofstra |
|---|---|---|
| Adjusted efficiency margin | +15.828 | +9.666 |
| Adjusted offence | 115.249 | 111.979 |
| Adjusted defence | 99.333 | 102.367 |
| Adjusted tempo | 70.6157 | 67.3313 |
| Raw offence | 112.869 | 111.977 |
| Raw defence | 102.877 | 101.254 |
| Effective FG% | 54.6%50 | 51.4%176 |
| Turnover rate | 13.4%34 | 14.5%99 |
| Offensive rebound rate | 101.8%152 | 74.3%270 |
| Free-throw rate | 37.8%107 | 31.6%262 |
| Opponent eFG% | 48.3%42 | 46.3%13 |
| Opponent turnover rate | 12.5%344 | 13.7%310 |
| Defensive rebound rate | 6.0%188 | 30.5%60 |
| Opponent free-throw rate | 23.4%3 | 35.1%184 |
| Three-point attempt rate | 42.2%132 | 42.8%119 |
| Raw tempo | 70.6145 | 67.1306 |
How this is measured
The projection is the existing projectMargin from lib/cbb/ratings: (AdjEM difference ± the fitted home advantage) × expected possessions ÷ 100, with pace the mean of the two adjusted tempos. It uses the latest snapshot, so it describes the two teams as rated on 2026-04-06 — it is not a line and it is not graded here.
Ranks are out of 364 rated teams, 1 = best; bold marks the better of the two where a metric has a better end.