Compare College Basketball Teams
How would two teams match up, by how much, and at what pace — and where does each rank?
2025-26 seasonthrough ratings as of 2026-04-06most recent completed season — 2026-27 has no ratings yet
Team 1: North Carolina change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
Team 2: Tulsa change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
On a neutral floor the ratings make North Carolina a 1.6-point favourite at about 71 possessions; at North Carolina it is +5.0, at Tulsa -1.8 (from North Carolina's side).
- Neutral
- +1.6
- 70.8 poss.
- At North Carolina
- +5.0
- 70.8 poss.
- At Tulsa
- -1.8
- 70.8 poss.
Margins are from North Carolina's side, from the snapshot of 2026-04-06.
| Metric |  North Carolina |  Tulsa |
|---|---|---|
| Adjusted efficiency margin | +15.828 | +13.543 |
| Adjusted offence | 115.249 | 117.625 |
| Adjusted defence | 99.333 | 104.1110 |
| Adjusted tempo | 70.6157 | 71.0121 |
| Raw offence | 112.869 | 117.619 |
| Raw defence | 102.877 | 104.098 |
| Effective FG% | 54.6%50 | 55.5%30 |
| Turnover rate | 13.4%34 | 14.6%110 |
| Offensive rebound rate | 101.8%152 | 116.1%101 |
| Free-throw rate | 37.8%107 | 40.9%50 |
| Opponent eFG% | 48.3%42 | 49.5%81 |
| Opponent turnover rate | 12.5%344 | 14.4%249 |
| Defensive rebound rate | 6.0%188 | 3.4%204 |
| Opponent free-throw rate | 23.4%3 | 32.1%110 |
| Three-point attempt rate | 42.2%132 | 46.6%37 |
| Raw tempo | 70.6145 | 71.694 |
How this is measured
The projection is the existing projectMargin from lib/cbb/ratings: (AdjEM difference ± the fitted home advantage) × expected possessions ÷ 100, with pace the mean of the two adjusted tempos. It uses the latest snapshot, so it describes the two teams as rated on 2026-04-06 — it is not a line and it is not graded here.
Ranks are out of 364 rated teams, 1 = best; bold marks the better of the two where a metric has a better end.