Skip to content
Zach Terrell

#11Zach Terrell

QB·Western Michigan·2016201513.1 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Zach Terrell is a 2-year Dual-Threat QB for Western Michigan. Zach's 2016 season ranks in the 90th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 402 plays — a elite rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Zach Terrell's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2016 Production

Passing
263/377 Comp/Att3533 Pass yards33 Pass TD4 INT69.8% Comp %
Rushing
249 Rush yards7 Rush TD80 Carries3.1 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2016 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency90
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency85
  • Clutch26
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)90th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency85th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among QBs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 11 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Peak game: 1.52 EPA/play in Wk 6 vs Northern Illinois (SP+ -2).

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Kaidon SalterLiberty0.71114.7345.6
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0
Tanner MordecaiSMU0.63014.0321.5
Blake SimsAlabama0.69615.4329.4
Malik CunninghamLouisville0.68114.7341.6

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.5201.52Wk 1 vs Northwestern: +0.23 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs North Carolina Central: +0.67 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Illinois: +0.33 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Georgia Southern: +0.83 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Central Michigan: +0.66 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Northern Illinois: +1.52 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Akron: +0.35 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Eastern Michigan: +0.85 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Ball State: +0.65 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Kent State: +0.41 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Buffalo: +0.76 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Toledo: +0.78 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Ohio: +0.44 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Wisconsin: +0.41 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1@NorthwesternW22-212.926/362181073.94000.23
2vsNorth Carolina CentralW70-2115/222554096.8410.67
3@IllinoisW34-10-6.79/131500071.62110.33
4vsGeorgia SouthernW49-31-3.918/272704096.13500.83
5@Central MichiganW49-10-6.115/211703091.81200.66
6vsNorthern IllinoisW45-30-2.418/243273093.1-411.52
7@AkronW41-0-5.621/312072086.63420.35
8vsEastern MichiganW45-31-8.229/353983186.6000.85
10@Ball StateW52-20-7.023/343673090.10.65
11@Kent StateW37-21-12.06/13830065.73910.41
12vsBuffaloW38-0-18.829/374454091.62400.76
13vsToledoW55-3512.319/251963090.71700.78
14vsOhioW29-23-2.119/312902258.91300.44
1vsWisconsinL16-2416.116/281571144.11410.41

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
44.0%
Passing plays
99.5%
Rushing plays
10.7%
Standard downs
36.8%
Passing downs
64.2%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.62
Passing downs
0.55
Pass / Rush EPA
0.60 / 0.55

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.670−0.192016
EPA per play · 2015 — 2016 · 26 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2015Western Michigan
8.4
201.4
2016Western Michigan
13.1
293.2

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.