Skip to content
Zach Hrbacek

#27Zach Hrbacek

Zach Hrbacek is a Committee Back for Sam Houston.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Zach Hrbacek's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2024 Production

Rushing
30 Rush yards0 Rush TD12 Carries2.5 Yards/carry
Receiving
2 Receptions5 Rec yards0 Rec TD2.5 Yards/rec
Returns
18 Kick returns369 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume13
  • Explosiveness0
  • Consistency81
  • Receiving32
Player type
Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency81th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.3200.32Wk 2 vs UCF: -0.32 EPA/play2Wk 12 vs Kennesaw State: -0.04 EPA/play12Wk 14 vs Liberty: -0.18 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
2@UCFL14-452.88253.10-0.32
3vsHawai'iW31-13-10.9
4vsNew Mexico StateW31-11-19.0111.00130
5vsTexas StateW40-395.4
6@UTEPW41-21-22.7
8vsWestern KentuckyL14-31-2.2
9vsFlorida InternationalW10-7-12.1
10vsLouisiana TechW9-3-11.6
12@Kennesaw StateW23-17-25.1144.00-0.04
13@Jacksonville StateL11-21-1.0
14vsLibertyW20-180.2133.00120-0.18
20vsGeorgia SouthernW31-26-1.71-3-3.00

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
4.5%
Passing plays
0.8%
Rushing plays
7.9%
Standard downs
4.6%
Passing downs
4.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.15
Passing downs
-0.65
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.26 / -0.45

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.