Skip to content
Yasin Willis

#6Yasin Willis

Yasin Willis is a Committee Back for Syracuse. Yasin's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 141 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Yasin Willis's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
553 Rush yards4 Rush TD129 Carries4.3 Yards/carry
Receiving
8 Receptions34 Rec yards0 Rec TD4.3 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume66
  • Explosiveness26
  • Consistency0
  • Receiving39
Player type
Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.32 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.43 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Tennessee (SP+ 15).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.4700.47Wk 1 vs Tennessee: +0.43 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs UConn: +0.08 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs Clemson: +0.13 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Duke: +0.31 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs SMU: -0.34 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Pittsburgh: -0.47 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Georgia Tech: +0.31 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs North Carolina: +0.16 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Miami: -0.33 EPA/play11
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsTennesseeL26-4515.023914.030.43
2vsUConnW27-205.111484.410.08
4@ClemsonW34-219.518945.201700.13
5vsDukeL3-386.611635.702700.31
6@SMUL18-3113.415412.70100-0.34
8vsPittsburghL13-308.413161.201-30-0.47
9@Georgia TechL16-419.310767.6032300.31
10vsNorth CarolinaL10-27-6.615614.100.16
11@MiamiL10-3820.713634.80-0.33

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
23.2%
Passing plays
5.0%
Rushing plays
45.4%
Standard downs
30.6%
Passing downs
8.3%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.01
Passing downs
0.19
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.43 / 0.08

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.