Skip to content
Xavier Williams

#26Xavier Williams

RB·Iowa·2025

Xavier Williams is a Pass-Catching Back for Iowa. Xavier's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 52 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Xavier Williams's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
285 Rush yards3 Rush TD49 Carries5.8 Yards/carry
Receiving
7 Receptions43 Rec yards0 Rec TD6.1 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume27
  • Explosiveness56
  • Consistency0
  • Receiving83
Player type
Pass-Catching Back

Third-down weapon out of the backfield. Routes, hands, and separation in coverage define this role as much as rushing.

3rd-down backReceiving threatPass protection
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.77 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.68 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs UAlbany.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.7100.71Wk 1 vs UAlbany: +0.68 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Iowa State: -0.17 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Massachusetts: +0.01 EPA/play3Wk 7 vs Wisconsin: +0.55 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Penn State: +0.19 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Minnesota: -0.57 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Oregon: -0.44 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs USC: -0.36 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Michigan State: -0.71 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsUAlbanyW34-71112211.111300.68
2@Iowa StateL13-169.97263.701-20-0.17
3vsMassachusettsW47-7-36.68384.8022300.01
7@WisconsinW37-0-4.47557.921600.55
8vsPenn StateW25-2418.1144.0021300.19
9vsMinnesotaW41-31.5441.00-0.57
11vsOregonL16-1825.9362.00-0.44
12@USCL21-2616.9133.00-0.36
13vsMichigan StateW20-17-3.4221.00-0.71
20vsVanderbiltW34-2720.35255.00

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
9.6%
Passing plays
4.4%
Rushing plays
13.1%
Standard downs
9.6%
Passing downs
9.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.15
Passing downs
0.01
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.17 / 0.18

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.