#1Tyriq Starks

QB·Florida Atlantic·2024

Tyriq Starks is a Dual-Threat QB for Florida Atlantic. Tyriq's 2024 season ranks in the 23th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 62 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

Usage share (volume)0.46
Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
Total EPA (value)0.51
Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Tyriq Starks's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2024 Production

Passing

39/63 Comp/Att550 Pass yards6 Pass TD2 INT61.9% Comp %

Rushing

63 Rush yards0 Rush TD23 Carries2.7 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs QB peers

Efficiency23
Volume83
Dual-Threat93
Consistency27
Clutch96

Player type

Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)23th %ile · below avg

Game-to-game consistency27th %ile · below avg

Key findings

▸Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
▸High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
▸High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
▸Peak game: 0.73 EPA/play in Wk 14 vs Tulsa (SP+ -21).

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗

Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	C/ATT	Pass Yds	Pass TD	INT	QBR	Rush Yds	EPA/play
11	@East Carolina	L14-49	-1.0	1/2	6	0	1	10.7	16	-0.51
12	@Temple	L15-18	-20.3	8/13	71	0	0	21.9	14	0.07
13	vsCharlotte	L27-39	-15.3	12/23	179	1	0	22.4	-13	0.46
14	@Tulsa	W63-16	-20.6	18/25	294	5	1	86.2	46	0.73

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy

Overall

28.9%

Passing plays

48.8%

Rushing plays

12.2%

Standard downs

24.7%

Passing downs

36.8%

EPA by down type

Standard downs: 0.31
Passing downs: 0.59
Pass / Rush EPA: 0.45 / 0.36

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).